Talk:cpp/utility/pair/get
From cppreference.com
[edit] Missing constexpr in c++11
Currently the description says:
- The index-based overloads 1-3 were missing the constexpr specifier in C++11
What exactly is meant by that? I remember that there were several edits on the wiki that involved adding descriptions of defect reports -- is this the case here? I think it's worth to discuss this and agree on a standard way to describe standard defects. --P12 19:05, 26 August 2013 (PDT)
- It was a defect against C++11, which, along with other defects that were fixed in time, became part of the C++14 draft standard. This page just needs dcl revs between c++11/c++14... Edited. --Cubbi 19:14, 26 August 2013 (PDT)