[edit] Strange wording for syntax 5

"the nearest enclosing namespace which contains (directly or indirectly) both the using-directive and the namespace ns_name." THis wording makes it sound like this should compile: I think it should be clarified. LB(T|C) 19:17, 27 March 2014 (PDT)

it's explained later in the using-directive's paragraph, but I'll add to the summary too (that it's only in effect until the scope ends) --Cubbi (talk) 19:32, 27 March 2014 (PDT)

[edit] Mistake in Syntax 6

"(6) using-declaration: makes the symbol name from the namespace ns_name accessible for unqualified lookup as if declared in the same namespace as where this using-declaration appears." Shouldn't this be "... in the same declarative region ..."? If it was the same namespace, a using-declaration used in a member function would not shadow other member functions. --Mkl (talk) 02:58, 13 October 2015 (PDT)

it does say "declarative region" later on the page, where it discusses the actual semantics, but it may be too standardesey for the summary. Perhaps "scope or namespace" would be a better intro. --Cubbi (talk) 06:20, 13 October 2015 (PDT)