Talk:cpp/utility/functional/plus void


Perhaps this would look better inlined into the main std::plus page? Like how std::unique_ptr and its specialization were done? --Cubbi 16:32, 6 August 2013 (PDT)

I think the approach of std::vector<bool> would work better. std::plus and std::plus<void> have almost nothing in common description-wise, so having separate pages would be a bit clearer, I guess.
Besides, I'd like to keep the layout of all pages simple, since some time in the future we'll implement a way to hide/show content based on user-supplied revision of the standard (dropdown menu or something like that). Uniform structure of the wiki would make the implementation of that feature much less complex. P12 16:54, 6 August 2013 (PDT)