Talk:cpp/ranges/ssize

Discrepancy: signed-integral-like (line 16) or signed-integer-like (line 33)
Both are used, but only one should be. Given that signed-integral-like is more generic, I think that it should be used across the definition of ssize. Can anybody opine?

I also noticed that sentence in line 27 is prime for a template (albeit in this case it starts with Otherwise, instead of In all other cases. ticotico (talk) 08:04, 14 January 2022 (PST)


 * Hi, Javier.
 * The correct term is signed-integer-like, as only it is used across the whole cppreference (except this page before I've changed it) and across the Standard. So, . --Space Mission (talk) 12:48, 14 January 2022 (PST)
 * Those lines (27...) have been slightly reworded.)
 * The Standard text to check is here. --Space Mission (talk) 13:36, 14 January 2022 (PST)