Talk:c/utility

Is this grouping warranted?
I am not convinced this is a reasonable grouping for C: it reduced the number of items available at the c|top-level C navigation page, which is already too coarse for discoverability. Not to mention this page uses C++-centric concepts (such as "Language support library") --Cubbi (talk) 06:29, 29 May 2015 (PDT)


 * The idea was to maintain the greatest possible "symmetry" between C++ reference and C reference, many of the pages of C++ have their equivalent in C. Diego91b (talk) 12:58, 29 May 2015 (PDT)