Talk:cpp/utility/move if noexcept

Simplifying of declarations
I think that the current declaration is overly complex for documentation purposes. Maybe we could replace the conditional in the declaration with a short,meaningful comment and place full declaration somewhere in the description below? The same could be done in all pages containing declarations with very long typenames. --P12 19:03, 26 August 2013 (PDT)
 * We could do what the standard does in several places, replace the type with and explain in the text. --Cubbi 19:24, 26 August 2013 (PDT)

noexcept used for throwing constructor
Constructors with std::cout are marked as noexcept while std::basic_ostream::operator<< can throw an exception: If an exception was thrown while extracting, sets failbit and, if failbit is set in exceptions, rethrows the exception.

Should I add try-catch to the example? --Chulup (talk) 17:01, 4 August 2016 (PDT)
 * aren't set in the example. But even if they were, it wouldn't change what it's demonstrating. --Cubbi (talk) 17:47, 4 August 2016 (PDT)

Readability of note
The note shows the use of move_if_noexcept in implementing vector; will I add a short example to explain this more readably?--LittleFlower (talk) 17:33, 27 January 2018 (PST)