User talk:76.21.41.59

Alternative implementations
Hi. I think some of your additions are out of scope of this wiki. We don't want to specify every way to implement a function, nor every way to use a function. This is quite redundant and distracting, since a programmer usually looks for ways to implement his design, not the other way round, i.e. picking a function and then looking where it could fit.P12 05:28, 28 September 2011 (PDT)


 * I think some of them have merit, although I don't know where they would fit in the current layout; "how to implement copy_if" has been a frequently-asked question ever since it was left out of C++98. Granted, we already have a reference implementation which is almost exactly what existing standard library implementations use (GNU, LLVM, and Microsoft all have a for loop where this wiki has a while). Implementing all_of/none_of in terms of each other, on the other hand, does not seem to serve a well-defined purpose. --Cubbi 07:12, 28 September 2011 (PDT)
 * We already have even 'how to implement copy_if' at the 'Equivalent function' section. P12 11:23, 28 September 2011 (PDT)