Talk:c/language/boolean type

Too granular
Why a whole page on what is only a two-line detail in implicit conversions? It seems too granular for practical use as a language reference. It's also named "Boolean type" so as a reader I would expect it to say what _Bool/bool/true/false are before mentioning what happens when scalars are converted to _Bool. --Cubbi (talk) 07:27, 15 October 2014 (PDT)


 * I agree. --Nate (talk) 08:41, 16 October 2014 (PDT)


 * "Boolean type" is the title of 6.3.1.2. As a reader of the standard, I would expect a title in cppreference to match a title in the standard when I go to cppreference for elaboration. Also, for further guidance, I looked for the word "granularity" in the FAQ's "What is the purpose of this site?" I struggle to avoid being too tutorial-ly while attempting to "provide programmers with a complete online reference."  I continue learning what is expected.  Regarding "Boolean type," I limited my submission to what is covered in 6.3.1.2 Newatthis (talk) 14:01, 16 October 2014 (PDT)


 * What is "a reader of the standard"? Programmers aren't its intended audience, which is the whole reason they use references such as this one to help them with their work. --Cubbi (talk) 19:27, 16 October 2014 (PDT)