Talk:cpp/locale/codecvt/~codecvt

In the example code for `struct Destructible_codecvt`: Are the explicit defined ctor and dtor really needed? Can't the class body be empty instead?

--85.164.202.245 19:59, 5 July 2017 (PDT)
 * deletable facet is a fairly common idiom, I think it makes sense to show its constructor in full since it doesn't take a lot of extra code (and the first time I had to write one, I missed the refs paramter). Agree on destructor, dropped. --Cubbi (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2017 (PDT)