Talk:cpp/memory/pointer traits

I think there's room for clarification for the member types. Really, I find the Standard itself makes it clearer than here, even when I try to word it.

and are defined differently depending on the  template parameter. And, the page only defines them for the template type case, not for the pointer type.

For example, is defined for  as, whereas for  it is  or the  of , as the page already describes.

What do you think?

wilhelmtell (talk) 13:13, 17 January 2017 (PST)
 * We have "2) A specialization is provided for pointer types, T*..." right after the description of primary template. Not sure what you want us to do here... T. Canens (talk) 13:24, 17 January 2017 (PST)