Template talk:dr list begin

Which standard(s) is a defect report applied to exactly?
I.e. given any mentioned defect report, is it applied to the revision of the standard specified in the "Applied to" column or to all revisions of the standard published so far? I.o.w. if I direct my compiler to adhere to an earlier revision of the standard, should I expect the result to be as if the defect didn't exist at all? — Radix (talk) 14:45, 15 April 2020 (PDT)
 * I think a defect report should be applied to the revision in which its related features are introduced. Some CWG DRs are described as applied to C++14 now but they should be applied to C++98 or C++11 IMO. --Fruderica (talk) 11:13, 24 May 2020 (PDT)

Experimenting with wiki-media tables style
This is DR format that cppreference uses now (below is an artificial example):

Defect reports
This is what would be more preferable, IMO (only a basis, any link stuff etc. is omitted). Main motivation is to enforce auto hyphenation of long sentences to enable auto splitting of long sentences on white-spaces in Behavior and Correct behavior columns.

TEST #2

Defect reports
TEST #3

Defect reports
The following behavior-changing defect reports were applied retroactively to previously published standards.


 * A link to the cppreference replica site
 * DR tables style
 * --Space Mission (talk) 03:27, 15 November 2020 (PST) / --Space Mission (talk) 07:23, 11 February 2022 (PST)