Talk:c/language/identifier

Reserved identifiers

Would the sets of identifier names reserved for future extensions to the C language or POSIX be sufficiently important to list on this page? Specifically, I am looking at "7.31 Future library directions." Newatthis (talk) 06:01, 12 January 2015 (PST)

those are already listed (or should be listed if missing) on their respective library pages, e.g. starting from the top I see that c/numeric/complex, c/string/byte, c/error/errno_macros, c/locale/LC_categories, and c/numeric/fenv/FE_exceptions, all mention the implementation-defined additional reserved identifiers, but c/types/integer, c/program/SIG_types, and c/atomic don't yet. ..Although, come to think of it, it's worth a note here saying that several library components reserve additional names and namespaces for future use and link to them. --Cubbi (talk) 06:18, 12 January 2015 (PST)

Thanks. I installed your suggestion about links to library pages. Newatthis (talk) 05:31, 13 January 2015 (PST)